1.
|
A
voter self-marked and verifiable, re-countable paper ballot
is essential to provide confidence in the integrity of election
results. |
2. |
Touch
screen machine printed paper ballots are proving to be unreliable,
cumbersome for the voter to review (and therefore ignored),
and subject to hardware and software malfunction or intentional
corruption of printer/software interface. (Centre County
touch screen machines do not even provide this form of paper
backup, i.e. none at all). |
3. |
The
optical scan system provides for voter generated verifiable
re-countable paper ballots that are electronically counted
from the scanned voter marked ballot for a final machine
count. The voters paper ballots are then deposited physically
in a ballot box for auditing and if necessary a 100% paper
recount in the event of a contested election. |
4.
|
The
comparative cost of touch screen vs optical scan equipment
dramatically favors optical scan equipment, all things considered.
|
5.
|
Touch
screen system longevity is proving to
be less than 5 years. |
6.
|
Optical
scan system longevity is proving to be about 20 years. System
maintenance costs beyond the ES&S 1 year warranty are
2 to 3 times higher for the touch screen system than the
optical scan system. |
7. |
The
number of touch screen systems required in larger precincts
is 3 to 5 times the numberof optical scan machines required.
Precincts with less than 1,000 voters can be combined where
the ballots are identical using optical scan equipment,
Centre County may be able to reduce precinct count from
85 to perhaps less then 70. Study and public response required. |
8. |
The
average number of poll workers required in Centre County
using touch screens would be about 2 times the number needed
if the optical scan equipment had been purchased. |
9. |
The
much larger and 3 times as many touch
Screen systems requires far more secure,
environmentally controlled storage space
than would the optical scan system. |
10. |
The
combined 10 year estimated cost comparison from even a cursory
assessment of the factors listed in 5. through 10. is rather
astonishing given that the 10th year would require the third
purchase of the more costly unreliable touch screen system.
Just one set of optical scan equipment would most likely
keep on chugging for an additional 10 years. |